Here’s something I just realized that is very hard for me to acknowledge: Sammy Hagar saved Van Halen. Yup, he did.
How so? Even though Van Halen were never a hairband they were hairband adjacent, having been the inspiration for many of them, whether they realized it or not. So, I’m assuming the distinct possibility that the classic Van Halen sound would not translate to the Alt-rock ‘90s, when Seattle was the promised land and Lollapalpoza gathered the tribes.
With the Red Rocker on board, they became a poppier, more commercially palatable version of the band—Van Jovi, as I have taken to derisively refer to that phase—which enabled them to survive. (Not coincidentally, Bon Jovi themselves did the same thing in order to avoid the hairband graveyard of the ‘90s.)
Now, fans of the Diamond Dave years will question whether it was ever worth it for the band to survive without him. They would likely reason that the brothers Van Halen could’ve taken a break after they broke off with DLR and not recorded anything until their swan song, A Different Kind of Truth [Interscope-2012] and no one would be worse for the wear.
Of course, that was impractical not to mention an incredibly selfish point of view, especially to those who enjoyed Hagar’s stint with the band and they are in the millions. (So were the bank statements of those closely involved in this rock and roll merger.) And, as the esteemed Chuck Klosterman once wrote, after Roth's departure they were too young to retire and too successful to quit, so...
But you can’t overlook how this led to the band’s not entirely positive mainstreaming, as well as their very uncool participation in the Crystal Pepsi soft drink fiasco and its ad campaign, which featured the VH song “Right Now”. Alternative Nation was not gonna be down with any of that.
So the question becomes, was it worth it to save Van Halen in order for them to make the records they did without the Diamond One?
I have an answer, of course, but the only one whose answer matters is you.
